<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/21/2020 7:31 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cKtcn05G=A3q8bYbZurQj4Knd23XXgLoGXG1hXgBsb4xQ@mail.gmail.com">As
far as the {jatlhchuq} is concerned, again I realize that there is
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">no Ca'Non to support it, but if we *can* say {qajatlhpu' HIghoS}, then
why couldn't we say too {majatlhchuqpu'..} Although, now that I'm
thinking this over, I don't know whether we've actually seen any
Ca'Non using the prefix trick with {jatlh}, so perhaps this all
approach has been wrong from the start.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>We have. The canonical word is <b>qajatlh.</b> <a
href="http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file=1997-06-29a-news.txt&q=qajatlh">http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file=1997-06-29a-news.txt&q=qajatlh</a></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>