<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">I’m just curious. What does this rather complex construction give you that the simpler {verengan ‘opuHwI’ ghaHmo’ SoSlI’’e’, not Qang Damoj} fails to convey?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I’m not commenting on the validity of your original. Okrand or the community at large can decide that. I’m at peace with whatever they decide. I’m just wondering why the more straightforward approach is less preferable.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">My goal is simple curiosity and amusement. My hope is that you can be more amused by the continued discussion than distressed by it.</div><br class=""><div class="">
<div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan<br class=""><br class="">rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.</div><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;" class=""><br class=""></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jan 15, 2020, at 9:14 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <<a href="mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" class="">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div dir="auto" class="">SuStel:</div><div dir="auto" class="">> The pronouns 'e' and net "are always </div><div dir="auto" class="">> treated as the object of the verb." </div><div dir="auto" class="">> Therefore this is ungrammatical, because > 'e'mo' is not the object of moj.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">hmm..</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">I didn't see that coming..</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">maj.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Lets approach this differently.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">We know we can say:</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">vIghro' tIQ'e' vIQej</div><div dir="auto" class="">I cherish the ANCIENT CAT </div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">So, we *can* place the emphatic {'e'} on the object.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">With that in mind, lets write:</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">{verengan 'opuHwI' ghaH SoSlI''e'; 'e''e' wISovmo', not Qang Damoj}</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Your mother is a ferengi prostitute; because we know THAT, you will never become a chancellor</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Would this be correct ?</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">~ mayqel qunen'oS</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" class="">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br class="">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>