<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/6/2020 10:51 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLpyA+hy4v1hG31oFN9ncKEVWRbmXZgGUbm8psuzeS3zA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">I was under the impression that {Hoch} could mean
"everything" only when used on its own, as for instance in {Hoch
vor Dargh wIb}.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">My misconception was, that in Hoch-noun
constructions, {Hoch} could *only* mean, "each noun", or "all
nouns" depending on the presence of {-pu'}/{-mey'} or not.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I dunno, maybe these are true. I don't think we've ever seen <b>Hoch
X</b> mean anything other than <i>each X,</i> but there's also
no rule against it meaning the more general <i>X of everything.</i>
Lacking anything concrete, I concede that they are possible, if
not definite. It's also the reason I suggest not overloading the
use of <b>Hoch</b> when we don't know everything about it. Stick
to what is known.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>