<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/27/2019 10:03 AM, Hugh Son puqloD
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:56EE24D6-5778-4213-92A4-58B7DEEC4803@qeylIS.net">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
      </div>
      <div dir="ltr">On Sep 27, 2019, at 07:55, SuStel <<a
          href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" moz-do-not-send="true">sustel@trimboli.name</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=UTF-8">
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/27/2019 7:04 AM, mayqel
            qunen'oS wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLG_r3jdCoej0Eeg-7OKbgqo0Xdn+guknUEu6oYODPfFg@mail.gmail.com">
            <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Since we don't know, what exactly a {petaQ} or a {yIntagh} is, I know
that probably there's no answer.

But I wonder..

How would you pluralize the {petaQ}, {yIntagh}, {toDSaH}, etc ?

Would you use {-pu'} or {-mey} ?</pre>
          </blockquote>
          <p><i>paq'batlh</i> has <b>petaQmey,</b> referring to people.<br>
          </p>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>But what if they were just scattered all about? Within the
        context of the paq'batlh verse, I don’t think such a reading is
        excluded:</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>nItlhejbogh petaQmey</div>
      <div>   tInuD chaHvaD</div>
      <div>   nIb yan wIjwI' jan je</div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>There's also zero evidence that the beings referred to are
      scattered about, and the "assembled warriors" are "at your side,"
      addressing Molor. Impossible to be scattered? No, but not very
      likely either. Almost any plural could be imagined to be
      "scattered" if you try hard enough.</p>
    <p>What this quote doesn't do is prove that you <i>must</i> insult
      the <b>petaQ</b> you're addressing by referring to them as
      things; it just seems that Molor happens to do so. It seems
      obvious that insulting someone with <b>petaQ</b> might lead you
      to further insult them by implying they're things instead of
      people, so saying <b>petaQmey</b> instead of <b>petaQpu'</b>
      might be common, but we have no data to support that.<br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>