<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/2019 1:45 PM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+byVSSwpPM4Tdz-17vcJkxmt8px=Ag0=tY47_N_crJsQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">If I knew when I'm supposed to use {-mey} on
{gher'ID} and when not, I'd be happier.
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Not as happy as I'd be, if I won a million
euros, but I'd be slightly happier than I'm now.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I mean, what the ghe''or is happening with this
word ?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Is it inherently plural ? Can we pluralize it ?
Why are some of its' meanings singular and some plural ?</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>My guess is that the word can be applied in the singular to the
outcome of a singular process, even if that consists of multiple
components, the "results." One process, one <b>gher'ID.</b> If
you performed multiple processes whose outcomes were not linked
into a whole, they would be <b>gher'IDmey.</b><br>
</p>
<p>Suppose you throw a ball into the air and want to see what
happens. Its falling to the ground is the <b>gher'ID.</b> If you
perform the experiment multiple times, each result is a <b>gher'ID.</b>
The collection of all of them would be <b>gher'IDmey. </b>But if
you combine all your separate <b>gher'ID</b> into a single
conclusion, that is a singular <b>gher'ID</b> too, albeit a
different one that has all the little <b>gher'ID</b> as its
component parts.</p>
<p>This is just my guess.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>