<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/5/2019 9:19 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cL1fpGv2aLHh9+8bJUaT9xbFh+GyzTSCyUpdGi3j1Z_AQ@mail.gmail.com">SuStel:
<div dir="auto">> There is plenty of difference. Sarvam Duj is
a ship. Duj Sarvam is a variety.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">True.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">But even if I say {Duj Sarvam vIlegh}, then again,
isn't it a vessel that I see ?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">This is where I can't *feel* the difference.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">No matter what I say, won't the listener
understand that "I see a ship" ?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Looking at a "type" is a very abstract thing to do. You're
recognizing a pattern, not just seeing a ship. You're being
confused by the word <b>Sar,</b> not by the noun-noun
construction.</p>
<p>Suppose I were looking at a bell. <b>baS 'In vIlegh</b><i> I see
a metal drum (a bell).</i> But suppose I were interested in the
composition of the metal. I might look closely at it and say <b>'In
baS vIlegh</b><i> I see the drum's metal.</i> I'm still
physically looking at the "drum," but what I'm really looking at
is the metal that it's made of. A <b>baS 'In</b> is a kind of
percussion instrument. <b>'In baS</b> is the metal that makes it
up. One is related to the other, but the phrases mean two
different things.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>