<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">On Jul 24, 2019, at 10:56 AM, nIqolay Q <<a href="mailto:niqolay0@gmail.com">niqolay0@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></span><font color="#000000"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></font></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><font color="#000000"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">I've heard that an old archeology trick for telling bone from stone is to lick it, since fossil bone is more porous and will stick to your wet tongue a bit. Klingon archeologists are obviously more rigorous when they apply this test, and require licking it again (<b>roSqa'</b>) to get two data points.</span></font></div></blockquote><div><br></div>You’re telling us that archeologists are concerned with re-licks?<br><br><div dir="ltr">-- ghunchu'wI'</div></body></html>