<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Thanks for clarifying my misunderstanding. I was unaware that {-‘e’} didn’t work like other type 5 suffixes that give a noun a non-subject or object reason to participate in the sentence.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">It seems to make it COMPLETELY different from any other Type 5.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Why not make it a Type 6 and give it a special rule preventing it from being used with any Type 5?</div><br class=""><div class="">
<div dir="auto" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan<br class=""><br class="">rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.</div><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;" class=""><br class=""></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 12, 2019, at 11:50 AM, SuStel <<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" class="">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/12/2019 11:42 AM, Will Martin
wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:DB403DEC-FDC7-4AED-AA51-951821B35978@mac.com" class="">
<div class="">Another option would be {cheS’e’ Sopbogh Hoch.} As
for rabbits, all which eat.</div>
</blockquote><p class="">Is this meant to be a noun-noun construction? That doesn't work,
because you can't put a type 5 noun suffix on the first noun of a
noun-noun construction.</p><p class="">If it's meant to be two components of part of a larger sentence,
like <b class="">cheS'e', Sopbogh Hoch vIlegh</b><i class=""> As for rabbits, I see
all which eat,</i> remember that Okrand told us that using a
type 5'd topic at the beginning of a sentence that isn't a subject
or object would be highly marked. It's basically not a real
option.<br class="">
</p><p class="">The only thing that <b class="">cheS'e' Sopbogh Hoch</b> would normally
be interpreted as is <i class="">rabbit which everyone eats.</i> <b class="">cheS'e'
Sopbogh Hoch vIlegh</b><i class=""> I see the rabbit which everyone eats.</i><br class="">
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name/">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" class="">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br class="">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>