<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">If you need to choose, I would use {voDleH} if only because {ta’} (accomplish) occurs often in Klingon as a suffix, verb, and noun as well as an element in other
nouns: e.g. {<b>jonta'} </b>engine, {<b>lIngta'}</b> <i>lingta</i> (type of animal), {<b>mellota'}</b> Mellota (proper name), {<b>mIqta'}
</b>machinery, {<b>qoSta'} </b>ribbon/tape, {<b>raHta'}</b> <i>racht</i> (type of food), {<b>'evta'} type of</b> animal similar to a newt/salamander, etc.<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">OTOH if both words are still actively used in the “modern” language, {ta’} may be preferred for official ranks (e.g. {Voragh ta’} Emperor Voragh) since most common
ranks or titles are one syllable words (HoD, Sa’, la’, joH, Qang, etc.). That would leave {voDleH} available for descriptions or other statements (e.g. tlhIngan wo’ voDleH wa’DIch ghaH qeylIS’e’ “Kahless was the first emperor of the Klingon Empire”).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">[BTW I just overlooked another example of {ta’} in {ta'puq} “prince” from The Little Prince.]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">--<br>
Voragh<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">____________________________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> mayqel qunen'oS<br>
</span>voragh:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt">> I can’t see any real difference in usage. Can you?<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt">Me neither.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt">I just *feel* as a more "formal" word the {voDleH} compared to the {ta'}, but of course this is just a "feeling".<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt">What I do wonder though, is whether in a looong text e.g. the new testament, I should choose one of the two and stick with it, or use them interchangeably.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt">But I guess there's no answer to that.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt">But if there *is* one, qeylIS knows, I would like to hear it..<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:4.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>