<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/26/2019 9:17 AM, Lieven L. Litaer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:f70de0bf-25d2-6f95-edc5-a96dacedf3c7@gmx.de">Am
26.06.2019 um 14:48 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Out of curiosity,
since I can't think of an example..
<br>
<br>
Lets say we have a {-bogh} phrase, e.g. {bartIq leghbogh
vIghro'}.
<br>
<br>
Is there a rule which prohibits, one of the nouns having a
type-5, e.g.
<br>
{-'e'}, <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>and<span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> at the same time the other
noun having a type-5 too, e.g.
<br>
{-mo'}, {-Daq}, {-vo'}, {-vaD} ?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I don't know such a rule:
<br>
<br>
{bartIqDaq bachbogh vIghro'mo' jIHagh.}
<br>
<br>
Why not?
</blockquote>
<p>I think what he means is that the type 5 suffixes apply to the
relative clause as a whole, not to noun phrases added to the
relative clause.</p>
<p>For instance, you can say <b>bartIqDaq leghbogh vIghro' jIba'</b><i>
I sit on the branch that the cat sees.</i> The <b>-Daq</b> on
the head noun turns the entire relative clause into a locative.</p>
<p>What mayqel seems to be asking is whether you could add another
type 5 to the other noun in the relative clause and also have that
apply to the main clause. For instance, <b>bartIqDaq leghbogh
vIghro'mo' jIba'.</b> I don't think this works, because it would
make the relative clause, which is a noun phrase, have multiple
syntactic roles, which is generally forbidden.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>