<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/25/2019 10:05 AM, De'vID wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+7zAmM918Z5e2gocqW_hg7+gLaqxHPQcBx3L4pUdzZ4NF4nwg@mail.gmail.com">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<p dir="ltr">
But can't one use {rIp} or {yej} on their own ? *Then* is
the problem (or at least my problem..)</p>
<p dir="ltr">
Should I, or shouldn't I use {rIp} and {yej}
interchangeably ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div>You can probably use them interchangeably for a particular
council or assembly for which a word hasn't already been
established, but once you've made the choice, you shouldn't
switch. For example, you shouldn't suddenly refer to the
*{qupyej} or the *{rIpquv} if you've already established these
things are called {quprIp} and {yejquv}. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Imagine that they're the English words "council" and
"assembly". Are these synonymous? As generic terms, they're
probably interchangeable in most cases, but you shouldn't refer
to an organisation known as the "Council of Elders" as the
"Assembly of Elders", and you shouldn't call the "High Council"
by the "High Assembly".</div>
</blockquote>
<p>As part of a name, no. But it would be perfectly reasonable to
address the Council of Elders as "this assembly."</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>