<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/30/2019 2:33 PM, mayqel qunen'oS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJcHDh-_MBLLGm-SD+Bq3dBPs_cZz3o9fdEqSpRSkKF1w@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">If we have a simple sao, then there is no
confusion in omitting punctuation before the {'e'}.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">But if we have an adverb, or a time stamp before
the {'e'}, then wouldn't it be clearer if we added some
punctuation before that adverb or time stamp ?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">for example:</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">wagh vIghro'mey tIQ 'e' wISov </div>
<div dir="auto">we know that ancient cats are expensive </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">wagh vIghro'mey tIQ reH 'e' wISov </div>
<div dir="auto">we always know that ancient cats are expensive </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Isn't it better to have some punctuation before
the {reH} ? And if yes, which punctuation ?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't see that it's better.</p>
<p>If I <i>had</i> to use punctuation, I'd use a comma. It's the
least separating of all of them, and is often interpreted as
merely a pause.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>