<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">On May 17, 2019, at 1:33 PM, mayqel qunen'oS <<a href="mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></span><font color="#000000"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></font></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><font color="#000000"><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">And (the subject of this thread), in order to say "someone sees all cats", we *have* to place the {-mey} on the noun after the {Hoch}, thus writing {Hoch vIghro'mey luleghlu'}.</span></font></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>I<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">n my internalized model of how {Hoch X} works,</span> the alternative {Hoch vIghro' luleghlu'} violates a kind of {rom}. The plural indication of the verb prefix isn’t strong enough to coerce {Hoch vIghro'} into meaning {Hoch vIghro'mey}.<br><br><div dir="ltr">-- ghunchu'wI'</div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"></div></div></blockquote></body></html>