<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/22/2019 11:47 AM, nIqolay Q wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG84SOsfzMDbh6iosxaZp5HQ_70kR45YfMjcoMt5zOv8-e-wNw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:17 PM
Christa Hansberry <<a href="mailto:chransberry@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">chransberry@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="auto">If I wanted to say, for example, "animals
which are not tribbles", how would I do it? I don't think
*yIHmey bIHbe'bogh Ha'DIbaHmey('e'?)* would be
grammatical... but is there a good way to say it? <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
class="gmail_default">Why wouldn't it be grammatical?
Pronouns-as-copula can take <b>-be'</b>: <b>loD Quch jIHbe'<i>.</i></b>
They can take <b>-bogh</b>: paq'batlh has <b>ghaHtaHbogh</b>.
<b>yIHmey bIHbe'bogh Ha'DIbaHmey'e'</b> seems completely fine to
me.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that the <b>-'e'</b> is not optional here.</p>
<p>Not only is it grammatical, but I don't see any reason not to say
it either, if it best expresses what you mean.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>