<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/12/2019 11:37 AM, Will Martin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:D7E5A4F5-EB2D-483E-AA2A-1502AB31B22B@mac.com">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Anyway, I do believe you are right and I had
misremembered {bIQtIqDaq vIghoS}. Thanks for pointing that out.
So, depending on the prefix, the {-Daq} is optional. I was wrong
about that. I personally think that {bIQtIq vIghoS} is
stylistically preferable to {bIQtIqDaq vIghoS}, since it is less
ambiguous, given that there could be some implied course that
doesn’t involve the river if you include {-Daq}, but that’s just
a personal opinion carrying no more weight than anyone else’s
opinion.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It's not exactly optional. There is a difference: <b>bIQtIqDaq
vIghoS</b> is "somewhat redundant, but not out-and-out wrong."</p>
<p>So your choices are to not use the <b>-Daq</b> or to use the <b>-Daq</b>
and be somewhat redundant.</p>
<p>And it's not really dependent on the prefix. It's just that the
prefix makes it clear whether you're talking about an object or a
noun that comes before the object-verb-subject structure. In TKD
the difference is shown without changing any prefix: <b>Duj
ghoStaH</b><i> It is approaching the ship</i> versus <b>DujDaq
ghoStaH</b><i> It is approaching toward the ship.</i> Using an
example without an illustrative prefix is just harder to follow.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>