<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/31/2019 1:49 PM, Will Martin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:4F137553-4B9F-4321-925A-D410B116D850@mac.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="">The weirdness is that the prefix suggests no direct
object, but the {-moH} seems to require one.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><b>-moH</b> does not require an object of any kind. Its
description says simply that it means the subject is causing
something. It doesn't say anything about objects. All it means is
that the subject <i>causes</i> the verb instead of doing the
verb. And then we have examples like <b>maghoSchoHmoHneS'a'</b><i>
may we execute a course (to some place)?</i> in TKD and <b>SeymoH
QeH</b> <i>anger excites</i> in TKW that back up the idea that
an object is not necessary.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:4F137553-4B9F-4321-925A-D410B116D850@mac.com">The
{-choH} is probably unnecessary, unless your focus is on the fact
that we are BEGINNING to cause each other to be angry. </blockquote>
<p>This is my understanding of what mayqel is asking for. It's not
an answer to why we always make each other angry; it's answering
how we got into the state <b>(-choH)</b> of being angry. The <b>-choH</b>
is needed for that. The confusion is entirely from the English
sentence: does <i>we anger each other</i> mean we get each other
into an angry state, or does it mean we are angry whenever we are
together? I would be more inclined to think he means the former,
and his Klingon sentence backs up that belief, but either is
possible.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>