<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/7/2018 7:47 PM, Daniel Dadap
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DBEFA6F9-807E-4CEF-83AE-36771135BF21@dadap.net">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p>Personally, I think Okrand just assumed that the difference
between <i>it</i> and <i>he/she/him/her</i> showed up the
difference well enough. It's the fact that English <i>they/them</i>
can cover plural <i>it</i> as well as <i>he/she/him/her</i>
that warrants special mention of the difference between <b>bIH</b>
and <b>chaH,</b> not the exclusivity of the
capable-of-using-language status of the words.<br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sure, but he/she/him/her doesn’t necessarily indicate
language capability in English. Non-language capable beings can
be hes and shes and hims and hers.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>English <i>he</i> and <i>she</i> (etc.) indicate sex or (more
recently) gender identity, something that Klingon doesn't
distinguish at all in its pronouns. In English a noun typically
graduates from an <i>it</i> to a <i>he</i> or <i>she</i> when
it obtains a male/female gender that someone cares to mention.
This doesn't happen in Klingon. Hence the question, when does a
Klingon noun graduate from an <b>'oH</b> to a <b>ghaH?</b> It's
not when the noun gains a gender. So when is it?<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>