<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div><br></div><div><br>On Jun 17, 2018, at 17:42, nIqolay Q <<a href="mailto:niqolay0@gmail.com">niqolay0@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Daniel Dadap <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel@dadap.net" target="_blank">daniel@dadap.net</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class=""><br>
> vaj Soj 'oH pIrun vIychorgh.<br>
<br>
</span>I thought “to be” constructions like this needed a topic marker? i.e., it should be {vaj Soj ‘oH pIrun vIychorgh’e'}. Or is that a mistaken understanding?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default">It does, yes. ghunchu'wI' made a typo.<br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default">Although perhaps he's from Morska? (But then he would have said {vaj Soj 'o pIrun vIychorgh}...<br></div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>ghlIngan hol vIjats. heghlu'me HaQ jajvam. nuqDaq 'o puchpa'? Dujvets 'o nuq? rIn. ghewmey SuqHo'!</div><div><br></div><div>How much of the dialect stuff in KGT is just Okrand retconning idiosyncrasies of particular performances?</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>tlhIngan-Hol mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>