<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Sorry if I missed it, but have you considered using the word «lIn»? This seems to be the sort of context that it was made for: One where there isn't a provider and a beneficiary, but a set of equal parties: «qo'vam wIlIn.»<br>
<br>
That doesn't address the more general issue of how to talk about "each other" as a beneficiary, though.<br>
<br>
//loghaD
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org> on behalf of SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, June 9, 2018 3:32:41 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [tlhIngan Hol] “We share with each other” / machqu'bej qo'maj</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/8/2018 9:14 PM, Daniel Dadap wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:691A7C8F-4470-4297-8465-BCA82A036C5A@dadap.net">
Do you see any problem with {HochvaD qo' wIbontaH} as I’ve used it in the reconstructed song?</blockquote>
<p>Just that it doesn't mean <i>share the world with each other,</i> but <i>share the world with everyone,</i> which is a more inclusive idea. It's not automatically the case that
<b>maH</b> and <b>Hoch</b> are the same group.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</div>
</body>
</html>