<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/29/2018 3:12 PM,
demonchaux.aurelie wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:5ae61934.1c69fb81.58e1.9d91@mx.google.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div>Savan, tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu'! </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I have been wondering for a couple of days now whether the
sentence pronouns {'e'} and {net} might take the noun suffix
{-Daq} to refer to the location where the previous sentence took
place.<br>
<br>
From the TKD, as far as I can tell nothing explicitly prohibits
adding any suffix to these pronouns - only their usage in
sentence-as-object constructions is described, but if you
consider that the TKD only gives a grammatical outline of
Klingon, well then maybe other kinds of usage also exist.<br>
<br>
Imagine if we could write:<br>
(?) {paq laD HoD, 'e'Daq jIba'} = I sit where the captain read
the book<br>
<br>
(?) {Hegh Subvam netDaq jaHQo'} = the place where this hero died
is avoided like the plague <br>
<br>
What do you think? Does it seem to make sense to you the same
way it does for me?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>My objection would be that you're not saying <i>I sit where the
captain reads the book;</i> you're saying <i>I sit at the
captain reads the book.</i> <b>'e'Daq</b> would not take place
at the location of the previous sentence; it says the previous
sentence IS a location, which seems meaningless to me.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>