<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline" class="gmail_default">O</div>n Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:51 AM, SuStel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" target="_blank">sustel@trimboli.name</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><span class="">
<div class="m_-2079763705240637367moz-cite-prefix">On 3/29/2018 9:28 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div id="m_-2079763705240637367d_1522330112387" style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12.0pt;color:#1f497d">
<p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">lieven:</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">> If you
mean this literally, we have {ngagh}</p>
<br>
<p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Indeed I
meant it literally. </p>
<br>
<p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">There are
times that the desired meaning would be better conveyed, if we
had a dedicated word meaning "someone performs sex on/to
another", (i.e. "fucks another"), than just using {nga'chuq}.</p>
<br>
<p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">I know that
probably we will not receive such a word, but I wanted to
request it anyway..</p>
</div>
<div class="m_-2079763705240637367quoted_separate_body">
</div>
</blockquote>
</span><p>That would be <b>ngagh.</b></p>
<p><b>targhlIj yIngagh! yIruch!</b><i> Go mate with your targ!</i>
(PK)</p>
<p><b>targhlIj</b> is the object of <b>yIngagh.</b></p>
<p>Don't be fooled by the euphamism <i>mate with</i>. This had to
be recorded for <i>Power Klingon</i> and get past censorship.<span class="HOEnZb"></span></p></div></blockquote><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default">I think <b>ngagh</b> might just be a regular word and not necessarily profanity. None of the other PK examples of curse warfare are particularly PG-13 rated, after all. I don't think it would be inappropriate, for instance, for a farmer to use <b>ngagh</b> to describe what they want their animals to do together, or a biologist to use it to describe what a bird hopes to accomplish with his fancy dance moves. IIRC, it was also used in paq'batlh for Kahless and Lukara getting it on after slaughtering a couple hundred warriors together, so it presumably doesn't just apply to animals.<br></div></div></div></div>