<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Mar 24, 2018, at 8:51 PM, SuStel <<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" class="">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
  
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/24/2018 8:31 PM, Daniel Dadap
      wrote:<br class="">
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:A2725737-A38A-4A15-AB65-572A592D114A@dadap.net" class="">
      <pre wrap="" class="">Would {nIqHomvam Daghajbe'chugh Qo'noSDaq yIjolQo’!} be a grammatically and lexically sound way to express this? I feel moderately confident about the lexical part, but not the grammatical part. {Qo’noS yIjolQo'}? {Qo’noSDaq yIjol’eghQo’}? {Qo’noS Dajolbe’nISlu’}? {Qo’noSoymeyna’majDaq yIjol’eghqangQo’choHmoHbejta'neSjaj}? {‘IHqu’ yIHmeyvelth}?</pre>
    </blockquote><p class="">I'd probably use <b class="">Qol</b> <i class="">beam away</i> instead of <b class="">jol</b>
      <i class="">beam (aboard).</i></p><p class="">We know that <b class="">HIjol</b> <i class="">beam me up!</i> is used by
      Klingons, so it seems the person or thing that gets beamed can be
      the object of <b class="">jol.</b> I can only assume the same is true of <b class="">Qol.</b>
      The destination, therefore, would be given by a non-object
      locative noun.</p><p class="">If <b class="">jol</b> and <b class="">Qol</b> can't flip subject and object like
      some words can (e.g., <b class="">meQ</b>), then we probably have to
      assume that the person beaming <i class="">must</i> be the object.
      Therefore, <b class="">Qol'egh</b> or something like it is required. <b class="">yIjolQo'</b>
      and <b class="">yIQolQo'</b> <i class="">sound</i> like they're right, but I'm not
      sure they are. We haven't seen these verbs used enough to be sure.<br class="">
    </p><p class=""><b class="">nIqHomvam Daghajbe'chugh Qo'noSDaq yIQol'eghQo'!<br class="">
        nIqHomvam Daghajbe'chugh Qo'noSDaq DaQollu' 'e' yIchaw'Qo'!<br class="">
      </b></p><p class="">Also consider using <b class="">Hutlh</b> instead of <b class="">ghajbe’.</b><br class=""></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>Thanks! {niqHomvam DaHutlhchugh Qo’noSDaq yIQol’eghQo’!} sounds good to me. (I’m writing a description for the App Store for the iOS boQwI’ port, and wanted to put something cute in Klingon in the blurb.)</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class=""><p class="">
      <b class=""></b></p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name/">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br class="">tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" class="">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br class="">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>