<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/24/2018 8:31 PM, Daniel Dadap
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:A2725737-A38A-4A15-AB65-572A592D114A@dadap.net">
<pre wrap="">Would {nIqHomvam Daghajbe'chugh Qo'noSDaq yIjolQo’!} be a grammatically and lexically sound way to express this? I feel moderately confident about the lexical part, but not the grammatical part. {Qo’noS yIjolQo'}? {Qo’noSDaq yIjol’eghQo’}? {Qo’noS Dajolbe’nISlu’}? {Qo’noSoymeyna’majDaq yIjol’eghqangQo’choHmoHbejta'neSjaj}? {‘IHqu’ yIHmeyvelth}?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I'd probably use <b>Qol</b> <i>beam away</i> instead of <b>jol</b>
<i>beam (aboard).</i></p>
<p>We know that <b>HIjol</b> <i>beam me up!</i> is used by
Klingons, so it seems the person or thing that gets beamed can be
the object of <b>jol.</b> I can only assume the same is true of <b>Qol.</b>
The destination, therefore, would be given by a non-object
locative noun.</p>
<p>If <b>jol</b> and <b>Qol</b> can't flip subject and object like
some words can (e.g., <b>meQ</b>), then we probably have to
assume that the person beaming <i>must</i> be the object.
Therefore, <b>Qol'egh</b> or something like it is required. <b>yIjolQo'</b>
and <b>yIQolQo'</b> <i>sound</i> like they're right, but I'm not
sure they are. We haven't seen these verbs used enough to be sure.<br>
</p>
<p><b>nIqHomvam Daghajbe'chugh Qo'noSDaq yIQol'eghQo'!<br>
nIqHomvam Daghajbe'chugh Qo'noSDaq DaQollu' 'e' yIchaw'Qo'!<br>
</b></p>
<p>Also consider using <b>Hutlh</b> instead of <b>ghajbe'.</b><br>
<b></b></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>