<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/23/2018 7:53 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJdUCK7Q6kjmwmzajmngNsvHWLF-WjkRo3coSDHRvF6Wg@mail.gmail.com">There
is something, which I'm wondering with regards to the {-Daq}.
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Unfortunately though, in order to describe it, I
need to write a ridiculous example.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Assume I want to say, "I give DuraS the middle
finger".</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Initially, it came to me to write: {DuraSDaq
qaywI' vI'agh}.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">However, this phrase gives me the impression that
someone has mounted DuraS, and there -on DuraS-, he displays the
middle finger.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">So, I'm wondering whether this assumption is
correct. Or could {-Daq} indeed be used to convey the intended
meaning ?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I *feel* that it is more appropriate to say
{DuraSvaD qaywI' vI'agh}.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Although since I'm not certain, if anyone could
shed some light on the matter, it would be great.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><b>DuraSvaD qaywI' vI'agh</b> is correct, because <b>DuraS</b>
is the indirect object of the sentence.</p>
<p>It would also be correct to say <b>DuraSDaq jIqay.</b><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>