<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/4/2017 1:32 PM, Lieven wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:cf8ec189-4489-e520-e933-a9a2ac7791a8@gmx.de">Am
04.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Steven Boozer:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Thanks. Note
taken.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
To your note you can add Robyn's answer on Twitte, who explained
why {DI-} was correct here. See the prefix trick is applied here.
<br>
<br>
<<wa' may' wInob, 'a chaHvaD wInobmo' {DInob} jatlhlu'.
muchvetlhvaD ADR ta'nIS ghetwI' net wuqmeH @reanolan ta
lulo'lu'.>>
</blockquote>
<p>Then it is either in error or the definition of the prefix trick
has been changed and we haven't been told.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>When the indirect object... is first or second person, the
pronominal prefix which normally indicates first or second
person object may be used. —Okrand, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://klingonska.org/canon/1997-06-29a-news.txt">Re:
Some quick questions...</a><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>-DI'</b> indicates a third-person object.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>