<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/4/2017 2:12 PM, Lieven wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:f2a11c3e-908e-5125-c41d-8d17df67aa16@gmx.de">Am
04.10.2017 um 20:05 schrieb SuStel:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">This isn't a
course in logic. </blockquote>
<br>
It also isn't a course of interpretation.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">"When the indirect
object is first or second person, oh and third person too, but I
feel like not saying that one for some reason, ..." That's
nonsense.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
That is YOUR interpretation of the text.
<br>
<br>
Neither of us can assume that one of each versions is true. That's
why I will not continue this discussion, because I have learned
that we cannot convince each other, and I accept the fact which
you taught me, which is when Okrand did not talk about something
we just can never know what his opinion on it is.
</blockquote>
<p>It's too bad you're not going to reply, because I'd LOVE to know
why you think Okrand went out of his way, twice in that article,
to separate first- and second-person objects from third-person
objects, but he REALLY meant that ANY objects can do this.</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>