<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/3/2017 10:46 AM, Lieven wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:b8bbb951-391f-e29b-b630-265df3b7a90c@gmx.de">On
10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">To avoid the
problem, I would make this two phrases:
<br>
{ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.} </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
Am 03.10.2017 um 16:42 schrieb SuStel:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">That implies to my
mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu vIlegh;
loDHom ghaH.*
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
You are definitely right, that's more accurate. I had the same
thing in mind as well. But then I thought like, hey, I already
said it's a BABY. No need to mention the {Hom}-part any more.
</blockquote>
<p>I wouldn't want to approach this too much like a math problem.
Suffixes aren't exactly like mathematical operators. A <b>loDHom</b>
is a different thing than a <b>loD,</b> not just a <b>loD</b>
that's had the operation of minorness performed on it.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>