<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/1/2017 9:34 AM, SuStel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:6471f373-b035-6e34-ae77-9ebeeb3ea4b9@trimboli.name">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/1/2017 9:32 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cL4VYk6mUF5zAtJXLq9F6oL0VSz672oHHX-X9fn=ibC-A@mail.gmail.com">The
source of my confusion, has been the fact that {poS} and {leQ}
are locatives, as for instance {bIng}, {Dung} etc.
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Locatives aren't always to be placed second in a
noun-noun construction ?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>None of those are locatives. They describe locations, but they
are not inherently locative as <b>naDev, pa', vogh,</b> and <b>Dat</b>
are. Only those four words are known to be inherently locative.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Also, technically speaking, the rule is that you can't put a type
5 suffix on the first noun of the noun-noun construction, not that
the first noun can't be locative. I have no idea whether one of
the inherently locative nouns are allowed to be the first noun,
but it doesn't break any stated rule we have.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>