<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/27/2017 8:30 PM, Felix Malmenbeck
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:1506558643152.27900@kth.se">
<p><span style="background-color:white;">So far, I believe I've
only ever used it when talking about refugees, in the sense
that I want all who are currently fleeing to
have-successfully-fled. I quite like the contrast between -taH
and -ta' and find it quite effective. Other times I've used
something like {Haw'ta'wI'pu' mojjaj Hoch Haw'taHwI'pu'.}, but
that's less punchy to my mind.<br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color:white;"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color:white;">So, I suppose I'd use it
when I think the desired effect is worth bending the rules,
and otherwise not.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>But only in an informal context, right? You wouldn't, for
instance, send a report to your superior with your <b>mu'mey ru'</b>
in it, right?</p>
<p>You wouldn't, for instance, submit a report that said <i>Earnings
were down this quarter because reasons.</i> That's an example of<b>
</b>a <b>mu' ru';</b> that's similar to the effect of using an
aspect suffix and <b>-jaj</b> together.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>