<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/20/2017 9:55 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+m3cbZntKGWzvR9BQfJO=rReLmc=CMVd+PJOuRngYm2Q@mail.gmail.com">Is
there such a rule, or is it something which is decided each time
based on context ? Or maybe even on which type-5 noun suffix is
actually used ? Because in Aurelie's example we have a {-vaD},
while in mine we have a {-Daq}.</blockquote>
<p>With <b>-Daq,</b> you can have things within things. You can
have both things be locative but not equal. Not so with <b>-vaD:</b>
every beneficiary is individual. You could probably make <b>-vo'</b>
work like <b>-Daq.</b></p>
<p>There is no rule here. We have scant evidence—Voragh has given
some—so I'm going on what seems natural to me given both my native
English bias and my knowledge of Klingon.</p>
<p>If you need a rule of thumb, then mine is this: if multiple noun
phrases occupy the same syntactic role in a single sentence and
are equal in their scopes, they should be followed by a
conjunction, otherwise they must be interpreted in some other way.
Other interpretations commonly include apposition or some being
subordinate in scope to others.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>