<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/21/2017 10:03 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+cWr2zcKkTXiMDZdfjEqsYbEUVzfZR22fDwRN22CSEJg@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">'oqranD:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">jarlIj qaq nuq?
The answer to the question yIH nuq? ("What is a tribble?") would presumably be a
definition or description of a tribble. This being the case, then, the answer to the question
jarlIj qaq nuq? ("What is your preferable month?") would presumably be a definition of "your
favorite month".
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">According the above, the answer to the {qaq nuq wornagh Sar ?},
wouldn't be "the name of the preferable variety", but "the definition
of the preferable variety".
However, would we have the same problem, if instead of the verb {qaq}
we had another verb ?
If we wrote {DuropmoH nuq wornagh Sar ?} for "which ale variety made
you sick ?", would we have the same problem ? I mean, would this
actually ask for "the definition of the variety which made you sick" ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><b>*qaq nuq wornagh Sar</b> doesn't seek a definition of the
preferable variety; it seeks a definition of the warnog variety. <b>nuq
wornagh Sar</b><i> what is a warnog variety?</i> Phrased the way
Okrand does, it is <b>wornagh Sar nuq.</b></p>
<p>The correct way to say <i>which ale variety made you sick?</i>
is <b>DuropmoHpu'bogh HIq Sar yIngu'.</b><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>