<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/16/2017 11:23 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLLZ9WLnP48+ew3xJpup650vW=ZrRLGKrHZ0ntvtvBoxQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">(KGT 33-34):
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">Children seem to be aware of the existence of the inherently plural forms, however, for they
use them as well, though usually with the suffix {-mey} superfluously appended: {chamey} (torpedoeses),
{ngopmey} (plateses).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">So, as I understand this - and someone correct me if I'm wrong - it
isn't grammatically wrong to add a plural suffix, to an inherently
plural noun; it is just that the resulting word/meaning is
strange/awkward.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>It is grammatically wrong. <i>Plateses</i> and <i>torpedoeses</i>
are grammatically wrong. They're awkward because it's
grammatically wrong.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>