<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/11/2017 10:28 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLM+Xa3h-NBiCQfjS_1+bpF1O2j5Sh_U8T1FHs9xqagCg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="auto">SuStel:</div>
<div dir="auto">> <b
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">DaH ghogh
HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'? </b></div>
<div dir="auto"><b
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"><br>
</b></div>
<div dir="auto">Isn't the object of {Dalo'bogh} the {ghogh
HablI''e'} ?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Not in that sentence. <b>ghorgh</b> is not an adverbial, so I
can't invoke the rule in TKD Addendum 6.7 allowing objects with <b>-'e'</b>
to move to the front.</p>
<p>As I said, I was playing a little loose with the positioning
rules. We don't ACTUALLY know whether <b>ghorgh</b> has any rules
regarding its placement, so I took the liberty of putting the
topic noun phrase before the <b>ghorgh.</b> If that's not
allowed, then my sentence won't work. It might be the case that <b>ghorgh</b>
follows the rules about putting time expressions before everything
else.<br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLM+Xa3h-NBiCQfjS_1+bpF1O2j5Sh_U8T1FHs9xqagCg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="auto">And if it isn't the object (case in which it isn't
necessary for it to be placed right before the {Dalo'bogh}),</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">instead of {<b
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">DaH ghogh
HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'?} </b>could we write {ghogh
HablI''e' DaH Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje' ?} ?</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>If my sentence is valid, then so is this one.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>