<div dir="auto">So, to summarize..<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">{juH vIjaH} "I go to the house" = correct</div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">{juHDaq vIjaH} "I go to the house" = correct but redundant</span><br></div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">{juHvo' jIjaH} "I go away from the house" = correct</span><span style="font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">{</span><span style="font-family:sans-serif">juHvo' vIjaH} "I go away from the house" = awkward and maybe wrong/problematic.</span></div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">Right ?</font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">qunnoq jan puqloD</font></div><br><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 Aug 2017 5:37 pm, "SuStel" <<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div class="quoted-text">
    <div class="m_-7040878814741614706moz-cite-prefix">On 8/9/2017 10:18 AM, Aurélie
      Demonchaux wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
        <p style="font-size:12.8px"><b>juHDaq vIjaH</b> is considered
          redundant because the object of <b>jaH</b> inherently includes
          a locative sense. Anything you <b>jaH</b> is something you're <b>jaH</b>-ing <i>to.</i></p>
        <p style="font-size:12.8px">There is no inherent "away from"
          sense to <b>jaH,</b> so <b>juHvo' vIjaH</b> is probably an
          awkward phrase, if not downright disallowed.</p>
      </blockquote>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">On the
          other hand, the Klingon Dictionary uses the below examples:</span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">{pa'Daq
          yIjaH} <Go to the room.> (section 3.3.5., p27)</span><br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">{pa'vo'
          yIjaH} <Leave the room!> (</span><span style="font-size:12.8px">section 3.3.5., p28)</span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">{jolpa'Daq
          yIjaH} <Go to the transport room!> (section 7.1, p73)</span><br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">So it
          seems ok and cannon to use -Daq and -vo' suffixes along with
          <jaH>.</span></div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    </div><p>I didn't say it wasn't. Specifically, I said that a <b>-vo'</b>
      noun <i>as the object of</i> <b>jaH</b> might not work (and only
      might). I didn't say anything about a <b>-vo'</b> noun that isn't
      the object of <b>jaH.</b> In the TKD example above, you can't
      tell whether <b>pa'vo' yIjaH</b> has <b>pa'vo'</b> as the object
      of <b>jaH</b> or as a syntactic noun at the beginning.</p>
    <p>Also, Okrand has revised his use of <b>-Daq</b> a little since
      TKD came out. For instance, in PK (before the <i>HolQeD </i>article
      where he talks about verbs of motion) he says <b>naDevvo' vaS'a'Daq
        majaHlaH'a'</b><i> can we get to the Great Hall from here?</i>
      According to the <i>HolQeD</i> interview, that should mean <i>can
        we, in the Great Hall, go from here?</i></p>
    <p>When Okrand revises the rules, I see that as invoking the
      statement in TKD's introduction that warns that the grammar is
      only a poorly understood sketch.</p>
    <p>So the validity of those examples in TKD to verify this point
      must be considered suspect.<font color="#888888"><br>
    </font></p><font color="#888888">
    <pre class="m_-7040878814741614706moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="m_-7040878814741614706moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name" target="_blank">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </font></div>

<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>