<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/9/2017 9:27 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJExYaGNtwYYPzdZ_anEswGU5QJgTZvugGyxjjQnno32Q@mail.gmail.com">Is
there any chance that 'oqranD, by saying the "beyond X", was
describing an exception with regards to the use of {Hay}, as
compared with the rest of the similar nouns ? (Dung, bIngDaq,
retlh, etc..)
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Because I too (or is it "me too" ?), would use the
{Hay} exactly as you did, i.e. placing it last. But this quote
from 'oqranD makes me wonder, whether there is here an exception
at work.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><i>I too.</i></p>
<p>I think he was just explaining how area nouns work, in case we
weren't sure or were thinking the word was an adjective. Maybe <b>Hay</b>
is more restrictive than other area nouns: sometimes you might use
the word <b>DungDaq</b> to mean <i>upward,</i> but Okrand might
be saying that you don't use <b>Hay</b> all by itself; you
wouldn't say <b>HayDaq</b> to mean an unspecified <i>to the beyond.</i></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>