<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/4/2017 11:24 AM, nIqolay Q wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG84SOuYYspvCv1sryK9cgSV8_tEukZ55ZkW27zjfNXONMNLNA@mail.gmail.com">
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><span style="font-size:12.8px"></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:12.8px">As far as the intentional
ungrammaticality of the law' puS construction, as it is
described in kgt is concerned.. Is someone allowed to make
use of it regularly, or is it only to be used under
special circumstances ?</span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It's a form of wordplay, which means it's appropriate
whenever wordplay is appropriate. You probably shouldn't do it
too often, or when there's the opportunity for confusion, or at
a very formal occasion, or in a situation where beginners are
learning.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Only the stuff in KGT, which involves substituting different
words for the <b>law'</b> and <b>puS,</b> is called wordplay by
Okrand; all the stuff from the <i>HolQeD</i> article about <i>as
Q as</i>, <i>not more Q than,</i> and <i>differently Q than</i>
is presented as ordinary grammar.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>