<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/3/2017 1:44 PM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cK53vtDN+v4NnDQVb1zCpSbCjUsA0bp4Hx52TcKU8wUDQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">SuStel:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">I suppose HochHom chab could mean almost all the pies, taken individually.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Would you say that "almost all the pies, taken individually" applies
for {HochHom chabmey} as well ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I'm not SAYING that at all. I'm making vague guesses. But,
following the pattern of <b>Hoch X[mey],</b> if the plural suffix
is present, it implies they are not taken individually. If it is
not present, they are taken individually.<br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cK53vtDN+v4NnDQVb1zCpSbCjUsA0bp4Hx52TcKU8wUDQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">SuStel:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">Almost all the pies, and almost all the pies, taken individually, mean the same things, except some pies are left out.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Some pies are left out from the "Almost all the pies", or from the
"almost all the pies, taken individually" ? Or from both ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Both. We're talking <b>HochHom,</b> not <b>Hoch.</b><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>