<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/14/2017 4:12 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+xCZzmmqiez3jma+o+sUv6fwKQv-5_JCEw_3PcpNUrKw@mail.gmail.com">On
another thread I noticed that both qurgh and lieven wrote:
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">qurgh:</span>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:sans-serif"><span
style="font-size:13.696px">> tetlhvam mejpu'.</span><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:sans-serif">lieven:<span
style="font-size:13.696px"><br>
</span></div>
<div dir="auto" style="font-family:sans-serif"><font
face="sans-serif">> </font>tetlhvam mejta'chugh</div>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I can understand that these obviously mean "this
list she left", and "if she has left this list" respectively.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">But just to make certain, I neen to ask: Couldn't
we also write {tetlhvamvo' mejpu'} and {tetlhvamvo' mejta'chugh}
?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is basically the "verbs of motion" argument all over again,
only this time the verb's object contains an inherent "away from"
meaning. I see no problem with it.</p>
<p>Apparently, Okrand has never used an object with <b>mej,</b> so
it's difficult to know for sure.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>