<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/6/2017 11:46 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLA2wG60TMoJBA1Sn20mpY3dFJO+c41rV90jGMuvo2jtA@mail.gmail.com">If
instead of {SoHtaHbe'chugh} we wrote {SoHbe'taHchugh}, and if
instead of {vIta'pu'be'} we wrote {vIta'be'pu'}..
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">1. Would you accept these choices as equally
correct ?</div>
<div dir="auto">2. Meaning-wise, would you find that they are any
different ?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I would accept them as grammatically valid but not necessarily
identical in meaning.</p>
<p>The example with <b>ta'</b> is easier, because it's an actual
verb. <b>vIta'pu'be':</b> I didn't <b>ta'pu'. vIta'be'pu':</b> I
did <b>ta'be'</b>. The former describes a thing I might have done
and says it didn't happen; the latter describes a thing I DID do,
which is the not-doing of something. The distinction is subtle,
and in most cases it wouldn't make a difference which you used.</p>
<p>The one with <b>SoH</b> is messier because pronouns only act
like verbs when they interact with other words, and because it
seems like <b>-taH</b> may be required when the pronoun is
combined with a locative, but that isn't clear... If someone were
to choose the other form than I did, I wouldn't have a problem,
and I wouldn't even be sure there is a significant difference.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>