<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/18/2017 2:23 PM, Ed Bailey wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABSTb1eCYx8a9Q8Fd0h7znjOh2CaSDz3-HYNYuMxb_wDdsW45w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">jatlh SuStel:
<p style="margin-left:40px"><b>-wI'</b> has the effect of
nominalizing the verb into the subject of that verb. A <b>vutwI'</b>
is the thing that performs <b>vut,</b> the subject of <b>vut.</b></p>
<div style="margin-left:40px"> </div>
<p style="margin-left:40px">If you were to say <b>*vutlu'wI',</b>
you'd be trying to nominalize the verb into a nonexistent
subject. No one in particular performs <b>vutlu',</b> so it
makes no sense to talk about the noun that performs <b>vutlu'.</b></p>
As I said, I'd like to hear what MO has to say on the subject.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I'd like to hear what Okrand has to say on every subject we ever
question. That's not an argument against what I said.<br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABSTb1eCYx8a9Q8Fd0h7znjOh2CaSDz3-HYNYuMxb_wDdsW45w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"> It's bound to be more nuanced, not to
mention a lot less bombastic and opinionated<span
class="m_973410155822178912gmail-">.</span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Fuck you, asshole. Bombastic enough for you?<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>