<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<p>I can understand the hesitancy with using <b>ben law'.</b> As
a time expression, <b>ben</b> by itself points to a time,
albeit a vague one. But it's a noun that indicates a point in
time. So what does it mean if you have more than one <b>ben</b>?
What are <b>benmey</b>?</p>
<p>Surely we already know the answer to that: <b>cha' ben</b>
means <i>two years ago,</i> so <b>cha' benmey</b> also means <i>two
years ago.</i> Multiple <b>benmey</b> means exactly the same
thing as singular <b>ben</b>. So I see no grammatical reason
why we can't speak of <b>ben law'</b>. <b>wa' ben, cha' ben,
ben law'</b><i> one year ago, two years ago, many years ago.</i></p>
<p>As for the original question, I'm not sure I see any
significant difference between <b>SaD law' ben</b> and <b>SaD
ben law'.</b> I think I'd go for the former, since it makes
more sense to me to speak of years ago counting in the many
thousands, rather than having many thousand-years-agos.<br>
</p>
<br>
On 12/6/2016 11:46 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+yhKW5Ki2a0ita5knU8bbNGmdcJ5tWLMtpNzDhGm0jVA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr"><br>
Andre Muller:<br>
> I might also accept {ben law'} as many years<br>
> ago, although I'm not sure it works well.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I remember voragh once writing: {ben law'qu'} has
been used many times on this list to indicate "once upon a
time".</p>
<p dir="ltr">Now, as far as the three possible choices I wrote are
concerned, I think that they are all valid with the meaning only
slightly changing from one to the other:</p>
<p dir="ltr">{SaD DIS ret law'} = many (thousands of years ago)</p>
<p dir="ltr">{SaD DIS law' ret} = (many thousands of years) ago</p>
<p dir="ltr">{SaD law' DIS ret} = (many thousands) of years ago</p>
<p dir="ltr">If the above analysis is correct, then perhaps this
all comes down to personal preference.</p>
<p dir="ltr">qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'</p>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 6 Dec 2016 6:32 pm, "André Müller"
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:esperantist@gmail.com">esperantist@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Don't forget that "years ago" is {ben}, so you
can either say:<br>
</div>
1) {SaD DIS law' ret} = many millennia ago, or<br>
</div>
2) {SaD law' ben} = many thousand years ago.<br>
</div>
<div>And these essentially mean the same.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I might also accept {ben law'} as many years ago,
although I'm not sure it works well.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>- André<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-12-06 16:01 GMT+01:00 mayqel
qunenoS <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target="_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">In order to indicate "many millenia ago",
which is the correct choice ?</p>
<p dir="ltr">{SaD DIS ret law'}, {SaD DIS law' ret} or
{SaD law' DIS ret} ?</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>