<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/4/2016 11:44 AM, Alan Anderson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFK8js1zqz6iu6QgvjrpSbPmAM7OB6O3+V_DXOU4RqxKiD86qA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:29 AM, mayqel qunenoS <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target="_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">At the BoP poster we have {telDaq wovmoHwI'} for
"wing light".</p>
<p dir="ltr">Doesn't this violate the rule that in a noun-noun
construction only the last can have type-5 suffixes ?</p>
</blockquote>
<div>It does, if you consider {telDaq} to have a Type 5 noun
suffix.</div>
<div><br>
It does not, if you consider it to be a compound {tel} "wing" +
{Daq} "location", making the phrase "wing-location brightener".</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>But then it really behooves you to explain why Okrand didn't just
go with <b>tel wovmoHwI'.</b><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>