<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/30/2016 12:28 PM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJvm7zHdTVk6c5QFvZSUEx+4jFXYG3XJJM-mi8K56H6Og@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">SuStel:<br>
> Okrand had recently added <br>
><b> -Ha'</b> to an adverbial for the first time</p>
<p dir="ltr">So, do we consider this to be for us a license to
place {-Ha'}, to whichever adverbs we wish ?</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>His general message has been, yes, adverbials can generally use <b>-Ha',</b>
but there's no absolute guarantee that all of them can do it.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJvm7zHdTVk6c5QFvZSUEx+4jFXYG3XJJM-mi8K56H6Og@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">And where do we draw the line ? Why stop at the
{-Ha'}, and not continue to other rovers as well ?</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Because Okrand has specifically about and used only <b>-Ha'.</b>
No other suffix has been used or even hinted at.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJvm7zHdTVk6c5QFvZSUEx+4jFXYG3XJJM-mi8K56H6Og@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">If someone writes something which 'oqranD never
wrote, we say "don't do it, it has no precedent". but if there
is a precedent, why not act upon it ?</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Precedent and suggestion exists for <b>-Ha';</b> it does not
exist for any other suffix.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>