<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/29/2016 11:04 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cKikU2UoAnjxJ6XT_csO=AaTV1afaygRddQEitTC_yfKA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">maj. time for the next question:
if instead of the:
{Daq HopHa’Daq qa’chaj nejlI’ qotar Qempa’QeH je}
we had the:
{Daq Hopbe’Daq qa’chaj nejlI’ qotar Qempa’QeH je}
would there be any difference in meaning ? to me the {Daq Hopbe’}
sounds like "a not far location", while the {Daq HopHa'} sounds like
"a misfar location" (whatever the ghe''or this may mean..)</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I think <b>Hopbe'</b> means <i>not far, but not necessarily
close either, though it could be,</i> while <b>HopHa'</b> means
<i>the opposite of far.</i> The English <i>not far,</i> on the
other hand, carries a connotation of <i>near</i> that Klingon <b>Hopbe'</b>
does not.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>