<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/29/2016 10:00 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJQp3kUvxO5LNNMCrgBe+pE3CL-ngxaADyAQWzkh5XRdw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">SuStel:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap="">Maybe for the same reason the English didn't use nearby?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">hmm.. is there a rule that in be-verbs used as adjectives someone can
place the {-Ha'}, or is this sentence from paq'batlh an exception ?
and remind me of something.. in verbs used as adjectives, we can have
the {-qu'}, right ? but can we have the {-be'} ? In the above
sentence could there be {Daq Hopbe’Daq qa’chaj nejlI’ qotar Qempa’QeH
je} ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>We've seen three of the four rovers used as suffixes on
adjectival verbs. <b>-qu'</b> appears in <i>The Klingon
Dictionary</i> (section 4.4) and is explicitly allowed. <b>-be'</b>
first appears in <i>Conversational Klingon</i> in the section on
counting as <b>wa'maH yIHmey lI'be'.</b> <b>-Ha'</b> first
appears in <i>Klingon for the Galactic Traveler</i> as <b>Duj
ngaDHa'</b> in the section on slang. Each type has been used
more than once.</p>
<p>Clearly, <b>-qu', -be',</b> and <b>-Ha'</b> are all allowed on
adjectival verbs. I don't think we've ever seen any other suffixes
on such verbs.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>