<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/28/2016 10:51 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2cJdRxMzyHh1HCORYPMsrYxr6PZNn-adLSDp34-t9joV6g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Some time ago, at another thread I had written (latlh Dochmey} and
{latlhmey Doch}, and asked "is any of the two preferable, or more
correct than the other" ? Then SuStel replied: "that depends, do you
want to say the other's things or the others' thing ?"
Now, lets forget for a moment that in order to say "additional things"
I can just write {latlhmey}; would it be correct to assume that both
(latlh Dochmey} and {latlhmey Doch}, apart from the above translations
written by SuStel, can mean "additional things" as well ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p><b>latlh Dochmey<br>
</b><i>other (additional) things<br>
another's things<br>
others' things</i> (because plural suffixes are optional)</p>
<p><b>latlhmey Doch<br>
</b><i>others' thing(s)</i></p>
<p>I wouldn't use <b>latlhmey</b> <b>X</b> to mean <i>additional
Xs. </i>Explicitly using the plural suffix seems to lock it
into the "someone else" meaning, though I can't say exactly why.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>