<p dir="ltr">my point exactly !</p>
<p dir="ltr">qunnoH<br>
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'</p>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 31 Oct 2016 4:32 pm, "SuStel" <<a href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name">sustel@trimboli.name</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="m_166787534294553270moz-cite-prefix">On 10/31/2016 10:26 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">SuStel:<br>
> If you can't put <b>reH </b>in its place and get<br>
> exactly the same meaning (with altered<br>
> emphasis), you're not using it right.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Interesting point.</p>
<p dir="ltr">However, because I fear we're being slowly led astray
from the original subject (of this thread), I would like to say
that I'm not searching for a way to say something like "each dog
I tickle bites me".</p>
<p dir="ltr">I'm (was) searching for a way to say "every time I
tickle a dog, he bites me".</p>
<p dir="ltr">Obviously {Hochlogh} can work perfectly for
situations like the last one.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Eh? Nobody brought up phrases like "each dog."</p>
<p><b>reH </b><i>dog</i><b> vIqotlhDI' muchop<br>
Hochlogh </b><i>dog</i><b> vIqotlhDI' muchop</b></p>
<p>One substitutes for the other and the only difference is that the
latter emphasizes the frequency at which it happens.<br>
</p>
<pre class="m_166787534294553270moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="m_166787534294553270moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name" target="_blank">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>