<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/3/2016 9:16 AM, Lieven wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1ebf871f-c5c6-89cd-2932-e1aeb467ceac@gmx.de"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">On 10/3/2016 4:40 AM, Lieven wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">reverses that. So it IS true that the
/word/ has a first person
<br>
object, but the prefix itself does NOT.
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
Am 03.10.2016 um 13:58 schrieb SuStel:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">No, the prefixes mean something different
when used with *-lu'.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Why you say no?
<br>
<br>
You repeat exactly what I said before. I even wrote in my message
that I agree with what you said before. Why do you always have to
say no?
<br>
<br>
We are agreeing absolutely on the same idea, and you still say no.
<br>
<br>
Alan: - It's green.
<br>
Lieven: - Indeed, it's green.
<br>
SuStel: - No, it's green.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Alan: It's green.<br>
Lieven: Indeed, it's gloop.<br>
SuStel: No, it's green.</p>
<p>You said "So it IS true that the /word/ has a first person
object, but the prefix itself does NOT."</p>
<p>I don't even know what this is supposed to mean.</p>
<p>A prefix does not <i>have</i> an object; it <i>indicates</i> an
object. A prefix like <b>vI-</b> can indicate a third-person
object <i>or</i> a first-person object, depending on whether the
subject is definite or indefinite.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>