<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/22/2016 2:53 PM, Lieven wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:287e2977-2316-3901-0643-8ff8e792bb45@gmx.de"
type="cite">For instance to say something like "I hope that I will
have killed the man by tomorrow evening" you can use the aspect
suffix.
<br>
<br>
{qaSpa' wa'leS ram loD vIHoHta' 'e' vItul}
<br>
<br>
NOW I hope (a non-contunious and not ended situation) that at the
moment called "tommorow evening" (an event in the future) the
action of killing is over (hence the -ta') suffix.
<br>
<br>
Is that understandable? (@mayqel)
<br>
Is that correct? (@SuStel)
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Let's drop the <b>'e' vItul</b> so that we don't get into
questions of whether I hope by tomorrow evening or I will have
killed the man by tomorrow evening. Besides, the second verb in an
SAO is prohibited from taking aspect suffixes.<br>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>qaS'pa' wa'leS ram loD vIHoHta'<br>
</b><i>before tomorrow night occurs I will have killed the man</i></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This looks right to me. If the <b>-ta'</b> had been left off I'd
read it more as a general declaration of activity: I'll be killing
men up to tomorrow night. And the <b>qaSpa'</b> doesn't need a
completion aspect because we're not talking about the completion
of night occurring.</p>
<p>By the way, your original with <b>'e' vItul</b> doesn't
necessarily mean that the hoping happens now (assuming you mean
the tomorrow night part to apply to the killing). Maybe I hoped
two weeks ago that I'd have killed the man by tomorrow night.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>