<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/5/2016 10:01 AM, Rhona Fenwick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:SG2PR0301MB098462FA47441503CAA2456CAA180@SG2PR0301MB0984.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"
style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p>On the other hand, I just noticed that Voragh notes {rugh
bIQSIp} "antihydrogen".<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Now I'm less certain. But in {rugh bIQSIp}, {bIQSIp} by
virtue of its position is clearly qualifying the type of
{rugh} - that is, "hydrogen of antimatter": of all the
different elements that form {rugh}, the one being talked
about is {bIQSIp}. I'm not so sure that I'm happy with
considering {voQSIp} to qualify a state or type of {betgham},
rather than that {betgham} is the qualifier or descriptor of
the {voQSIp} and so should come second. But cha' DarSeqmeywIj
'oH neH.<br>
</p>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
</span></font></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I think you've got that backward: in <b>rugh bIQSIp,</b> <b>rugh</b>
is qualifying the type of <b>bIQSIp.</b> It's hydrogen, of the
antimatter kind.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>